Opinions - PeugeotPeugeot 106
Car: Peugeot 106
Capacity: 1.1 unleaded petrol
Mileage: 180 000
Applied additive: Engine Ceramizer, dosage: 2
An engine made the first 300 km while standing with conversion factor 1 hour=100 km. Yet after the first hour revolutions got evened and engine operation got noiseless. I could not believe what I might observe. After the next hour the engine got more dynamic, but noticed kind of smoke every 15 minutes, so I decided to test it. According to my observations it was not an oil but something resembling a burned rag. I suspected that it was due to combustion of Ceramizer component and it proved true alter on. So what I observed after two hours operation is practically still today speaking about an engine performance (I made above 10 000km). After I had finished running in I set off to check Ceramizer action during riding. The first thing that I noticed was prompt reaction for pressing down an accelerator, enhanced dynamics without any tuning, driving simply on Vpower Shell petrol (I tested after making 2000 km since ceramizer application, and no other cars might catch up with me when starting at traffic lights). So I could see surprised faces of other drivers – what a joy it was to leave behind these superb cars. After covering 2 km my car produced kind of another smoke but it was the last one fortunately.
Now I can say that running in while standing for cars with fuel controlled by computer is not the best solution –it is much better to run in the car while driving. Bur in spite of these strange effects my car operates very well. My experiences may be confirmed by 5 onlookers, namely drivers that work with me that made fun of me regarding this additive. But when they saw results they bought these ceramizers and applied them in their cars, namely VW Polo (with gas installation), Alfa Romeo – I do not remember model (with gas installation), Honda Civic (with gas installation), Opel Astra (with gas installation) and Citroen AX (petrol).
In their opinion Ceramizer action was the same like in case of my car. I would like to add that I am very satisfied from reduced fuel consumption. Before Ceramizer application it was around 5-5.5 l at extra urban and 6-6.5 l at urban driving, but after Ceramizer application it was 4.4.3 l at extra urban and 5-5.4 l at urban driving (I provide range values as fuel consumption depends on style of driving).
Wiesław Królikowski
Peugeot 205GTi (1987)
Unfortunately I do not possess any documentation confirming enhanced technical parameters in my cars. Fitness test of Peugeot 205 GTi 1.9 petrol year 1987 with mileage of 300 000 km, in which I applied Ceramizer had much better start and better performance (e.g. acceleration measured with a stopper enhanced from 9.9 s up to 100km/h to 8.6s – quite an amazing result). The engine operation got noiseless additionally and fuel consumption reduced by 1.1 l /100km. I observed similar results in my Fiat Tipo 2.0 GT year 1992 2.0 petrol engine with gas installation and mileage of 205 000 km. The car much better achieved revolutions, temperature of an engine and fuel consumption got reduced. Besides I had no problems with starting in winter. Noiseless engine operation followed. At present I have got Daewoo Nexia 1.5 GLE year 1997 with mileage of 135 000 km and I am going to apply Ceramizer into this car very soon.
Daniel Rozdzialik
Peugot 309 (1989)
I applied ceramizers in two cars - namely Audi 200 2TD Diesel from 1989 with mileage of 220 000 km (at least according to odometer reading), and second Peugot 309, petrol from 1988 year with mileage of 198 000 km. In both cases significant noiseless and smooth operation followed, and an oil and fuel consumption got reduced. Namely fuel oil and LPG gas consumption got reduced, although in case of LPG it was more evident, as before application it was 8.5-9.5 of LPG and it got reduced to 7.5-8 liter !!
Speaking about performance of both cars after making recommended 500 km, in both cases noiseless operation followed and acceleration got enhanced. I did not applied other additives after Ceramizer use. As for a gearbox (I applied gearbox Cerazmier in Peugot 309 as I experienced problems with changing into 3 gear and the gearbox seemed to be overloaded in spite of a fresh oil) after an additive application and observance of instructions I had no more problems with gears – smooth changing after covering 350 km.
So I can say that I am more than pleased with purchase of these products and its operation. Although I did not expect they proved to be efficient!! Conclusion - Ceramizer was efficient for an engine and a gearbox!!! It is very difficult to sum up fuel additive as its effects might have been connected to action an engine additive. Unfortunately I do not have scans regarding compression pressure measurement ( I did not have needed equipment).
I made these observations firstly in May 2005 for my Audi 100, and in February 2006 for my Peugot.
Andrzej Wiśniewski
Peugeot 405
My opinion regarding Ceramizer application is a positive one. I noticed a noiseless engine operation, easier starting in winter and fuel consumption reduction by 0.3 l.
Observations made regarding: 8 300 km
Car: Peugeot 405 GLD with 1.9 Diesel engine
Jan Batarowski
Peugot 406 (1999)
Peugeot 406 2.0 TDI, 1999 year , mileage of 190 000 km. I read opinions, applied all additives according to guidelines and the following results followed: more dynamic car, an what convinced me mostly was enhanced parameters of compression pressure that in January 2005 was 29/28/29/28 and after making 1500 km 30/30/31/29 tested on a gauge without possibility of any printed diagram but carried out in a reliable garage. Also the second promise got true in respect of fuel consumption-it got reduced from 7-8 l per 100km to 6.1 -6.9 .
Speaking about gears changing I can not say much , but for sure it has become noiseless.
|
